The word "socialism" seems to have become the sexiest word for millennials and democrats of any age. It invokes images of fairness, equality, justice, and a good living standard, however, there have not existed any countries that turned to socialism that did not lose the liberties that we Americans have enshrined in our Bill of Rights.
On the other hand, "nationalism" has become an evil cuss word among millennials and democrats of all stripes. Very interesting. Have you ever pondered the difference between nationalism and internationalism, or between national socialism and international socialism?
National Socialism is Nazism. It arose in the era of the Weimar Republic in Germany and it is well-known that it resulted in scapegoating of undesirable minorities, racial hygiene laws, seizure of their property, murder, and a totalitarian government that controlled virtually every part of people's lives. Censorship, bible-banning, book-burning, domestic spying, gun confiscation also attended the rise of national socialism.
Communism, on the other hand, is global socialism. It always was, even in its Marxist theoretical form, a global movement, well before the Bolshevik Revolution. In other words, it is socialism with an international tenet rather than a national one. Communists today still blame its failure on the fact that they were never able to implement their political system on a global basis. That was, however their goal, and still is today. In the history of communism, wars were spread all over the world to expand its power, and at one time it controlled about two thirds of the world's resources. The international aspect of communism can be seen in the anthem used by many former communist countries. The name of the song is "The Internationale", revealing its globalist character. Its words are steeped in class warfare, violence, and globalism, and a borderless world, or global socialism. If you are interested, you can go to Wikipedia and look at the text. Here is part of it:
"There has never been any saviour of the world, Nor deities, nor emperors. Not even those heroes, Entirely depend on ourselves to save ourselves!
Decree the common salvation. To fully kill those bandits' crestless lives Requires sacrificing spirit. Quickly, while this furnace burns red-hot, For only when the iron is fired will we succeed in forging it! Refrain Who is the creator of the world? Only us, hard working labours and farmers. Everything is for producers only, Where can parasites be accommodated! How much hot blood of ours have bled, Only to handle that cruel and evil monster. If it is someday fully killed, A red sun will shine all over the five continents!"
The elimination of borders and the sovereign nation-state is required for the implementation of global socialism. Let's just call it globalism. It is really the re-emergence of a deadly political virus that kills, impoverishes, and enslaves. If you thought Nazism was bad, then you haven't seen anything yet. The violence is palpable among young globalists today. I can sense the blood lust. The scapegoating of undesirable minorities is also well underway and its difficult to imagine the rhetoric of the left not escalating to violence on a national level here in the United States. White people are now considered racially impure by the new democrats. So are males of every race. So are the "rich".
Racial hygiene and purity laws have been implemented in the form of Affirmative Action in a crippling way to our society and in a way that has actually fanned the flames of racism into the fire that it has now become. The policy of instituting racism in order to abolish racism was doomed to fail from the beginning, but it has succeeded in promoting socialism and class envy.
When I hear conversations of people saying things like "this neighborhood is too white", or "this company is too white", for instance, I know that the socialist cultural revolution we are experiencing is about to go violent.
The socialist emphasis on eliminating borders is their attempt at ethnically cleansing the world from countries that are too white. This is a fact, and it has also become the "checkmate" move of the left, because if you defend white culture anywhere in the world, you are called a white supremacist or a Nazi. Its time to look at who the real Nazis are in today's cultural strife and to acknowledge who is scapegoating undesirable minorities and who is constantly turning everything into a race or gender issue, and who is politicizing every aspect of culture (totalitarianism?).
Borders and the integrity of the sovereign nation-state is the defense that is required for a free people. If these things crumble, then violence is just around the corner. If we care about liberty, then we will protect our borders and adhere to the rule of law and the republican form of government guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution in order to protect against majority tyranny.
John L Wadsworth is a member of the New California State movement from El Dorado County.